Detection of Methanol Contamination in Spirits Using the Amplifi ID Raman Spectrometer
Introduction
Methanol (MeOH) contamination in illicit or improperly produced alcoholic beverages pose a significant public health risk on an international scale [1, 2]. Small amounts of methanol occur naturally during fermentation, but excessive levels can arise from poor distillation practices or deliberate adulteration [3]. The acute toxicity of methanol arises from its metabolic conversion to formaldehyde and formic acid, which inhibit mitochondrial respiration and can cause blindness or death [4, 5]. The lethal dose of methanol is generally considered to be around 1 gram per kilogram of body weight (or 1.2 mL/kg), although reported toxic doses vary widely from 30 to 240 mL [4]. Typical contamination levels in adulteration incidents range from a few percent to very high concentrations (>50 % v/v) [3]. The maximum tolerable concentration (MTC) for an adult consuming 425 mL of 40% Alcohol By Volume (ABV) beverage over two hours is estimated at about 2 % v/v methanol, allowing only a modest four-fold safety margin for variability in intake, folate status, or metabolic factors [6]. To further minimize risk, some jurisdictions impose strict regulatory limits. The European Union, for example, sets a general upper limit for naturally occurring methanol in spirits at 10 g methanol per liter of ethanol, equivalent to ~0.4 % v/v MeOH in a 40 % ABV beverage [6, 7].
Image 1. Bottle of alcohol beside the Amplifi ID Raman Spectrometer.
The Amplifi ID Raman Spectrometer (Image 1) is a compact, non-destructive, rapid testing device well-suited for addressing urgent beverage safety and public health concerns related to methanol poisoning. It uses Raman spectroscopy to detect and quantify methanol in beverages through its unique vibrational fingerprint, readily distinguishable from that of ethanol (Figure 1). Notably, methanol’s symmetric C–O stretching band at ~1020–1036 cm⁻¹ is clearly separated from ethanol’s characteristic bands at ~885 cm⁻¹ (C–C–O) and 1050–1060 cm⁻¹ (C–O). Precise analysis of these key spectral regions enables detection limits below 0.1% v/v, making it a practical and reliable tool suitable for field deployment. Accordingly, the Amplifi ID Raman Spectrometer plays a vital role in protecting public health by detecting hazardous methanol levels in commonly consumed beverages.
Figure 1. Representative Raman spectra of commercial spirits such as Mezcal (purple), Gin (red), and Tequila (green), in comparison with pure ethanol (yellow) and methanol (blue) spectra. Measurements were performed using Amplifi ID Raman Spectrometer.
Experimental Details
To mimic common commercial spirits (~40% ABV), such as tequila or gin, ethanol-water mixtures (ethanol, denatured, Sigma-Aldrich, Canada) were prepared and spiked with methanol (≥99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich, Canada). The total alcohol content was held constant at 40% (v/v), while the methanol concentration was varied between 0.05% and 8% (v/v). The samples (4 mL) were measured using a standard glass vial with the Amplifi ID vial holder, which features automatic parameter selection.
Results and Discussion
Figure 2 shows the Raman signal from 1000 cm⁻¹ to 1150 cm⁻¹, which represents the primary region of interest for detecting and quantifying methanol in ethanol–water mixtures. Increasing methanol concentration results in a proportional rise in the intensity ratio between the methanol C–O band (~1020–1036 cm⁻¹) and the ethanol C–O band (~1050–1060 cm⁻¹). The Raman scattering contribution from water in this spectral window is negligible.
Figure 2. Raman spectra of ethanol–water mixtures spiked with increasing concentrations of methanol (0–8 % v/v). The methanol C–O stretching band near ~1020 cm⁻¹ increases with concentration.
Figure 3 shows the relationship between methanol concentration and the corresponding peak-intensity ratio of the methanol (~1020 cm⁻¹) and ethanol (~1050 cm⁻¹) bands, with the error bars representing one standard deviation. Each concentration point in the calibration curve was measured in triplicate, with measurements performed by different technicians and on multiple Amplifi ID Raman Spectrometers to assess reproducibility across operators and instruments. To evaluate the detection performance of the Amplifi ID Raman Spectrometer under these experimental conditions, the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined from blank-based measurements. The LOD was calculated as three times the standard deviation of the blank measurements divided by the slope of the calibration curve, while the LOQ used a factor of ten (10). These estimates represent the lowest methanol concentrations that can be confidently detected and accurately quantified using the instrument. For this experiment, the LOD and LOQ were determined to be 0.095 and 0.32 %v/v, respectively. This achieved LOD is well below both the 2 % v/v maximum MTC reported in toxicological literature [6] and the ~0.4% v/v methanol limit derived from the EU spirit-drink regulation [3]. Methanol poisoning is most often associated with the consumption of contaminated alcoholic beverages, commonly containing methanol concentrations far exceeding safety thresholds, which underscores that the Amplifi ID Raman LOD and LOQ provide meaningful protection against real-world hazards.
Figure 3. Calibration curve showing the relationship between methanol concentration and the Raman peak-intensity ratio of the methanol (~1020 cm⁻¹) to ethanol (~1050 cm⁻¹) bands. Each point represents the mean of three independent measurements, with error bars showing ± 1 standard deviation. The linear regression (R² = 0.998) demonstrates excellent quantitative correlation across the tested range (0–8 % v/v).
Conclusions
The Amplifi ID Raman Spectrometer provides an effective, rapid, and reliable method for detecting methanol adulteration in alcoholic beverages. Its ability to identify methanol at levels below regulatory limits makes it a valuable tool for safeguarding public health, especially in field or non-laboratory environments. Implementing such technology can significantly enhance efforts to prevent methanol poisoning from contaminated drinks in community settings or beverage production and quality control.
References
-
M. Tonezzer, N. Bazzanella, F. Gasperi, and F. Biasioli, ‘Nanosensor Based on Thermal Gradient and Machine Learning for the Detection of Methanol Adulteration in Alcoholic Beverages and Methanol Poisoning’, Sensors, vol. 22, no. 15, p. 5554, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/S22155554/S1.
-
H. Vašková and M. Tomeček, ‘Rapid spectroscopic measurement of methanol in water-ethanol-methanol mixtures’, MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 210, p. 2035, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201821002035.
-
G. Botelho, O. Anjos, L. M. Estevinho, and I. Caldeira, ‘Methanol in Grape Derived, Fruit and Honey Spirits: A Critical Review on Source, Quality Control, and Legal Limits’, Processes 2020, Vol. 8, Page 1609, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 1609, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/PR8121609.
-
K. Erik Hovda, K. E. Mcmartin, D. Jacobsen, and K. McMartin, ‘Methanol and Formaldehyde Poisoning’, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20790-2_78-2.
-
C. Hoyte, J. Schimmel, A. Hadianfar, S. Banerji, S. Nakhaee, and O. Mehrpour, ‘Toxic alcohol poisoning characteristics and treatments from 2000 to 2017 at a United States regional poison center’, DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 367, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S40199-021-00418-4.
-
A. J. Paine and A. D. Dayan, ‘Defining a tolerable concentration of methanol in alcoholic drinks’, Hum Exp Toxicol, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 563–568, 2001, doi: 10.1191/096032701718620864.
-
K. B. Kim et al., ‘Selective methanol detection in adulterated alcoholic beverages using a chemiresistive sensor-embedded analyzer’, Sens Actuators B Chem, vol. 445, p. 138561, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.SNB.2025.138561.